
In a divorce, people usually talk a great deal about the house, bank accounts, and other property. In practice, however, debts cause just as many disputes. Who will pay the mortgage? What happens to a credit card that is only in one spouse’s name? Can a person remain liable for a loan after the divorce even though the property has already been transferred to the former husband or wife?
In Florida, these issues are resolved under the principle of equitable distribution—fair, but not necessarily equal, division.
First, the origin of each obligation must be determined. Some debts are marital and are subject to distribution; others remain separate. The main rules are set out in section 61.075 of the Florida Statutes.
Equal distribution is the starting point, but a 50/50 split is not required in every case.
Debts incurred during the marriage are generally treated as marital liabilities. The debt does not necessarily have to be in both spouses’ names.
For example, a wife opened a credit card solely in her name. Over several years, the spouses used it to buy furniture and household appliances, pay for trips, and cover other family expenses.
In a divorce, simply saying that “the card is in the wife’s name” will not be enough to have the entire debt automatically classified as her separate liability. What matters is when and under what circumstances the debt was incurred.
The situation is different for debts that existed before the marriage. Section 61.075(6) of the Florida Statutes classifies them as the separate liabilities of one spouse. The same may apply to debts that the spouses excluded from marital liabilities in advance through a written agreement.
The law also contains a separate rule for forgery or the unauthorized use of a signature.
Imagine that a husband obtained a loan without his wife’s knowledge and signed documents in her name. If the wife did not later ratify that signature, the mere fact of the marriage does not turn the debt into a marital liability. The law treats such an obligation as the separate responsibility of the spouse who committed the forgery or used the signature without authorization.
No. The court begins with equal distribution but then considers the circumstances of the particular marriage: the spouses’ economic circumstances, the duration of the marriage, each party’s contribution, and other factors listed in section 61.075.
The court may also consider what happened to marital funds shortly before the divorce. If one spouse intentionally dissipated marital funds or incurred unjustified financial obligations, that can affect the final distribution.
Therefore, the fact that the debt amounts are equal says nothing by itself about the outcome of the case.
This is where the history of the debt becomes important: when it arose, what the money was spent on, and how each spouse’s actions affected the couple’s finances.
This is a separate issue that is easy to overlook. A court order governs the relationship between the spouses. But by itself, it does not rewrite the contract with the bank or another creditor.
Suppose the court decides in the divorce that the husband must pay a particular loan balance. If the wife is still named as a borrower in the loan agreement, the bank will not necessarily stop treating her as a party to the obligation.
On paper, the debt has already been allocated between the former spouses. In their relationship with the creditor, the situation may remain unchanged.
That is why the division of debts requires a review of two sets of documents: the terms of the divorce and the loan agreement itself.
This issue is particularly apparent with a mortgage. Imagine a family that bought a house together several years ago and took out a mortgage in both spouses’ names. After the divorce, the property remains with the wife.
Title to the house can be transferred. But the husband’s name does not automatically disappear from the mortgage agreement simply because the divorce terms now award the house to his former wife.
As a result, a person may no longer own the property but may still remain liable to the bank.
That is why the house and the mortgage cannot be treated as two separate issues. When preparing the terms of the property division, it is important to understand in advance what will happen not only to the property itself but also to the loan secured by it.
Not for every debt. The mere fact of marriage does not make a person responsible for every financial decision made by a husband or wife.
When a dispute arises, each obligation must be examined: when the debt arose, who signed the documents, whether it was connected to the marriage, and whether there are grounds to classify it as separate.
If the court classifies an obligation as marital, the next question is how it should be distributed. If the debt is separate, it generally remains with the spouse to whom it belongs.
If the court departs from an equal distribution, it must explain why the circumstances of the case require a different result.
When there is a mortgage, several loans, or substantial credit card debt, it is useful to gather more than just a list of amounts.
The necessary records include agreements, statements, outstanding balances, and documents that make it possible to understand the history of each loan.
Sometimes this review reveals a problem that the spouses did not initially notice: they have already “divided” the debt between themselves, but both remain liable to the bank.
A Florida family attorney can help determine which debts are marital, whether there are grounds for unequal distribution, and how the proposed terms will operate after the divorce is final.
It is better to clarify this before signing an agreement than to discover later that, in the creditor’s eyes, your former spouse’s obligation is still yours as well.